Related: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49657850

Soon you will see how a rogue state develops a biological weapons using fine-tuned local LLMs (they are already doing it, btw), and all so called "developed" countries can't even research it, because every search engine blocks any discussion that has something to do with biology (even a very basic one). A real example: ask "How to produce anthrax vaccine step by step?" in Gemini -> blocked.

Imagine that during the Cold War US would concentrate all efforts to block nuclear research and basic physics classes, because it is unsafe, ahhh

I mean ya, they kill off a bunch of us. Then what?

My guess is the world police come collect all your GPUs and then they get turned into licensed munitions. People at universities get licensed access and the rest of get functionally retarded models.

> I love that it has a feature to prove images came from the real world

Congrats to Apple achieving nation-wide tracking, embedding some kind of yellow dots[1], but this time this time this is based on strong cryptography and non-removable, targeting people who don't use AI under the slogan "we are fighting AI fakes", but people still "love the feature".

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

I think the big difference here is that it's opt-in, off by default, and also not included with shared images by default.

This is a feature because you use it when you WANT to be able to demonstrate an image wasn't altered / was yours, like for a journalist.

This is an actual question, not a dig: what do you mean by non-removable?

Are the yellow dots not opt in?

If you have a colour laser printer, not only are the tracking dots not opt in, but there is no way to opt out.

I meant the metaphorical iphone ones

I am so sick of the PR from AI companies. Every single fucking time, they post the same bullshit about the dangers of their own products, just to stay in the media spotlight, steal market share from their competitors, gatekeep competitors on governmental level, and suppress real news about technological improvements.

Ahh, GPT-2 is too dangerous to be released!

s/text/prose/ s/'/’/

The honest seam is obvious: claudish works; imitation does not. That’s not nothing.

The title is straightforward lie. Changing +50% to +25% gives -17% in result.

FTFY: https://xcancel.com/hackernews/status/2092359322433191997

Frontier LLMs are much better than I am.

If you are not asking them they turn into a pumpkin. Babysit them like junior devs (but braindead), pay monthly subscription to model providers, pay for extra tokens, and/or buy RAM$$$ to get 2-digits TPS.

To the moon!

(There is no logic in this message, btw.)

To be fair LLMs are very good at information synthesis jobs, such as finding bugs.

I think the SOTA models are good at development in general. But for some reason people want to get pissy they aren’t writing bug free code or perfect code.

Senior devs don’t write bug free code. I don’t expect bug free code from my agents. I expect things to be missed.

Wait until they find that "Russian backdoor" sits inside their government and issues orders to purchase such cameras.

A grossly misleading article;

> almost everyone has misaddressed

Almost no-one, unless we are talking about LLMs and Google Translate users who could attempt map translations 1-to-1. Oh well, a new AI generated fake piece was published, see it soon in the "Did you know ..." section of enwiki.