Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure I would optimize for liquidations.


Sure. I was just making the point that as a business partner, they have a lot of things beyond a DDA offering that they need to fix.

When you are trying to get 100% of the investor's money back after a hard run that didn't make, it makes one feel a bit raw to have sand thrown in your gears in process. And the cool thing about getting investors whole is that they'll show up to your next party. If I had remained a fan of SVB, the investors would not have allowed them back at the table after some of the things that occured. If all that SVB is is money, I can that from GE Capital. I start to question what value they are bringing to the table.

I know-- anecdote is not data and all that.

None of this is meant as commentary against what's going on in the head-line story. I could see this being a solid win for both parties. Yay. I like happy middle-ings.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: