>But we still need to factor in X and Y sometimes because there will always be areas where that X or Y advantage will cause disparity.
But why do we care about gender anymore than disparities that are the result of different X and Y when the population is divided by f. Why is f = gender treated differently than f = height, eye color, parental income, weight, amount of time spent playing games per week > 10, number of veggies grown in the garden last year < 20, or any other metric we can come up with?
10% of people have gene ABC123, then 10% of every group must be made up of people with that gene? Only madness lies down that path.
But why do we care about gender anymore than disparities that are the result of different X and Y when the population is divided by f. Why is f = gender treated differently than f = height, eye color, parental income, weight, amount of time spent playing games per week > 10, number of veggies grown in the garden last year < 20, or any other metric we can come up with?
10% of people have gene ABC123, then 10% of every group must be made up of people with that gene? Only madness lies down that path.