Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> This holds back so many projects - how expensive hosting web applications eventually becomes.

Hosting web applications costs a fraction of what it did 5-10 years ago, both in terms of straight costs as well as operational expenses.



The interesting thing, to me, is not the overall cost of hosting, but the new ways that we can host.

I've got a current project that I'm working on. I have no idea how successful it will be and I'm not interested in putting a ton of my own money at risk to see if it will be successful. But using a model where I have zero of my own servers (Lambda, API Gateway, Static hosting) means my fixed costs are under $20/mo and my variable costs scale with usage. All I need to do is ensure that my per-user monetization is higher than my per-user cost and my application scales up without any effort on my part.

In the era of hosted servers, capacity planning and scale out took a ton of my time and energy on projects like this. And while I might end up paying a bit less in the long run if I followed the same methodology today, not having to worry about that kind of stuff and being able to focus solely on the application is really nice.


I think what you said and what the parent comment said are both entirely true.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: