Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Facebook Gives Harman His Name Back, Apologizes (techcrunch.com)
51 points by icey on Jan 23, 2010 | hide | past | favorite | 10 comments


Taking away his vanity url was, or should have been, a deliberate action.

I cannot believe that there would be enough trademark complaints that someone doesn't check the persons name before taking away a vanity url and sending such a message.

And if techcrunch had not gotten involved I cannot see them giving the same response to any person.


Props to them for responding this quickly though.

Also, the apology actually sounds sincere.

(follow up on http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1071623)

It's amazing what a little media attention to your support issues will do.

We should institutionalize that somehow. Like the public wall of shame of old, a vetting board decides if your issue gets pushed down the pipeline and all the news outlets subscribe to it.

That could create some serious consumer power.


Institutionalizing this kind of attention would normalize it. It would remove its extra-ordinary nature, its very newsworthiness, thus diluting the effect.


I think that depends on how you bring it.

If you were to bundle the facebook complaints, the google complaints and so on then by virtue of the cumulative effect it would be newsworthy again.

But you're right that 'making it normal' would detract from the newsworthiness, so you'd have to combat that by sheer volume.


We should institutionalize that somehow. Like the public wall of shame of old, a vetting board decides if your issue gets pushed down the pipeline and all the news outlets subscribe to it.

Or, one could run it something like how Stack Overflow is run, with a community voting on what issues are most deserving of attention, and helping to solve the issues and get the word out. Then the media could just skim the issues that were voted up the most from time to time, when they're having a slow news day.


"We should institutionalize that somehow."

Everybody should have at least 10000 followers on Twitter.


Deliberate action, yes. But still motivated by trademark. They simply chose the path of least resistance.

The faux-pas was actually made by Harman's PR person. If he had shut up everything would have gone smoothly.


From personal experience I'll say this: nothing makes Facebook move faster than bad press (or the threat of bad press).


Not only Facebook, every corporations.


Wow - anyone see the number next to his inbox in the screenshot? 2863 messages!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: