> Do you personally feel more safe, or better, whatever the adjective you want to use would be... about logging in to a remote server that uses software you can read the source for versus software you can't read the source for?
Ah, sorry, I see where the confusion is. This is a different issue entirely:
It's desirable for the program running on the server to be Free so that I could run my own (if I chose to do so), and therefore be in control of my own computing. For example, I run my own GNU Social instance.
Ah, sorry, I see where the confusion is. This is a different issue entirely:
Source code wise, the problem is non-free JavaScript served to the client: It's desirable for the program running on the server to be Free so that I could run my own (if I chose to do so), and therefore be in control of my own computing. For example, I run my own GNU Social instance.