Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm amazed that Gladwell didn't have more sense than that. Does he really think that someone who could fall for Communism could understand changing hearts and minds?

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POUM)



Isn't that essentially an ad hominem?


Against which party? I don't trust Orwell's judgement -- fighting for POUM, and making the argument above, weren't the only errors he made -- and I don't think Gladwell should have trusted it either.

(But then, Gladwell wrote a book called _The World is Flat_ in 2000, and it was about free trade, not fundamentalism; he's not exactly someone who I look to as a paragon of good judgement either.)


POUM was anti-Fascist and anti-Stalinist. If you think it was an error to support such a party in Spain at that time, I'm afraid it says more about your judgement than Orwell's.


Anti-Stalinist isn't anti-Communist. (Sorry for the extremely late post, though.)


In addition to your misreading of Homage to Catalonia, you also misattributed -- the author you're looking for is Thomas Friedman.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: