Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It also showcases the great thing about self-driving cars. Even though accidents will happen, when it does there will be plenty of sensor data and logs which can be examined to find the exact cause in a post-mortem. An improvement to the software can then be made, and millions of cars deployed can all effectively learn from a single accident.

With humans, the amount of knowledge gained and the collective improvement of driving behavior from a single accident is low, and each accident mostly provides some data points to tracked statistics. With machines, great systematic improvements are made possible over time such that the remaining edge cases will become increasingly improbable.



Just like planes.

I'll have to point that this is necessary, but not sufficient for enabling an ever improving, extremely safe activity.

Aviation also have a just right amount of blame running in the system that is hard to replicate on any other area.


What does post-mortem mean in this context? The software one (after an accident) or the human one (after death)? I think It's crazy that the word gets back the original meaning..




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: