>The entire premise of the article, as far as I can tell
The premise of the article is that choice is good for workers, and urbanity fosters choice. Corporations creating isolated campuses removes choice and reduces quality of life.
>A building designed to keep everyone looking inward is better suited to a religious cult than to a creative organization.
That's not the intent of the design and the view is pretty much identical for both sides: trees. The point of the shape is to connect as much as possible while creating a secure courtyard. The closest path from one side of the building to another is outside.
The premise of the article is that choice is good for workers, and urbanity fosters choice. Corporations creating isolated campuses removes choice and reduces quality of life.
Regardless, it's very clear that there's no way to win with these people. No matter what decisions the managers and architects arrive at, there will always be some ankle-biting from noncontributing journalists and academics with political axes to grind.
The point of the shape is to connect as much as possible while creating a secure courtyard. The closest path from one side of the building to another is outside.
Interesting, I didn't know that. My understanding was that the courtyard area would be easily accessible to everyone working there.
The premise of the article is that choice is good for workers, and urbanity fosters choice. Corporations creating isolated campuses removes choice and reduces quality of life.
>A building designed to keep everyone looking inward is better suited to a religious cult than to a creative organization.
That's not the intent of the design and the view is pretty much identical for both sides: trees. The point of the shape is to connect as much as possible while creating a secure courtyard. The closest path from one side of the building to another is outside.