Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They may disagree irrationally, but they still disagree with causation. This is basically saying; figure out what causes them to believe what they believe, acknowledge the validity of that causal chain, and then introduce new information.

The new information could be about being less wrong (updating the rules of their causality) or it could be a new situation on which to apply their existing ways of thinking.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: