Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's equivalent to about 10.8m. Apparently, there's a giant sequoia that's [EDIT: at max 11.1m], so it's not unfathomable but likely an error as you noted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Sherman_(tree)



> Apparently, there's a giant sequoia that's 24.1m wide

I'm not sure where you got that number, but according to the link you provided, the max diameter of General Sherman is 11.1 m


You are correct; I apologize. I misinterpreted girth in the Google result I found as width. I edited my original comment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: