Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am guessing is that when he started working on this stuff docker was in it's infancy (still is IMHO), and had no reason/time to port it.


Absolutely this, vagrant has bee reliable, stable (barring the odd oops on a new release) and fits my workflow, docker is interesting but the switching cost to payback ratio isn't there (yet, I'd really like to get rid of having to use NFS, that's accounted for 80% of my vagrant issues).


Or you could have glanced at the article and seen that your guess is wide off the mark.. ;-)


Which article?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: