Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

(To be clear, I'm not saying it's an anti-pattern, I'm just saying that calling it "no operational overhead" is naive)


Mince words all you want, they stayed operational when many others did not. That's success in my book.


For an increased risk of going down when everybody else is up. Is that still success? And at what other costs?

It all comes down to risk vs. cost vs. gain.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: