> The idea of introverts and extraverts being distinct groups of people with completely different neurological responses to social situations is a largely false one
Why would you say that? Even perusing the wikipedia article shows that there is at least some evidence for a biological basis, and that it is being researched.
Maybe it's not up to your standards, but it's far from being settled as a bunch of 'woo'
Have you read the article? It defends the original position you quote, especially in the case of jungian psychology and myer-briggs model.
Everytime you hear someone saying you can divide the world in two separate categories, you can know that the vision it creates is blurry at best. Juste like saying pi = 2. It's technically not wrong, but a rather useless info.
Why would you say that? Even perusing the wikipedia article shows that there is at least some evidence for a biological basis, and that it is being researched.
Maybe it's not up to your standards, but it's far from being settled as a bunch of 'woo'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraversion_and_introversion#...