Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I find continuation-based stuff impossible to reason about; the only way I can understand the flow is in terms of values i.e. futures. And if we're working with futures I'd rather have them work as a plain old monad with for/yield that looks like any other monad, rather than having to remember what some unique future-specific syntax desugars into.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: