When volunteers presented passport applications containing photographs of other people, the officials did not recognize the discrepancy fourteen per cent of the time. One might attribute this alarming statistic to reckless inattention. Yet the system for hiring passport officers likely rests on the faulty premise that applicants have essentially equal skill in recognizing faces.
The obvious low-tech solution to this problem is disallowing bringing your own photo, and having a photo booth at the passport application site, where you have to take the photo in front of the officer.
Why do many countries still permit bringing your own photo?
It sounds odd because typically in the UK you need to get your photos and application signed by some 'trusted member of society', e.g. someone who does a job on an approved list of professions and isn't supposed to have known you for more than 2 years.
I suppose that's easily bypassed though. I had a much harder time validating my photo for my business account - the only verification that mattered then was one I had to pay for at the post office. It had to have a paper trail.
The setup you described would be really expensive and cumbersome compared to people submitting their own photos, assuming of course you can apply for a passport by post or online and don't have to go to an office with an appointment anyway, in which case it may make some sense even if it only increases the quality of photos by a few percent -- to be honest I'd be skeptical that the improvement would be more than this, the parameters for self taken photos are rather strict after all, such that it's quite hard to take photo that 'doesn't look like you' because of light, hair, makeup etc and have it be accepted.
Just last week I applied Indian Passport because of some changes in my address & othet particulars, the process was to fill an online form, pay fees online, book appointment online, show up with a confirmation SMS & old Original Passport alongwith one more ID Original. So basically no photocopies, no paper. Went in at pre-opted time, entered a number from my SMS in a kiosk machine, confirmed all particulars filled in online as correct, stood for photo, put fingers on scanner when asked, got another token number, where when called, a single person asked me to show him my original existing passport & second ID, all ok, received a SMS & Email with all the details, & a case number to follow the progress. All paperless & interacted with only one human. All this was managed by Tata Technology & Indian Government.
Fun Fact, Machine didn't show me my photo till the very last step, & I thought of changing & having one more try to pose with looking bit good, got an error that Photo will he taken only once, & only them can initiate the re-click of photo, not me.
We also have similar machines in Portugal for ID card and passport issuance, but luckily they will ask if you like the picture or if you want another taken...
I think yes, as Tata is a reputed brand & group of companies (auto, tech, steel, infra & many) & also because whole passport office & operation is always supervised by government officials. Before this, it was always a big bundle of original & photocopied documents & forms.
With a quick look there seem to be 100+ unique TCS domain logins on github. I’m sure there are some smart people there, but this seems like a seriously troubled organization.
Putting trust in TCS just because it is Tata is very worrisome. Tata products are 'reputed' only in local Indian market bubble, propped up by government protectionist measures.
Lots of places do exactly this. In fact the last time I applied for a passport, it was completely paperless, no paper forms to enter, no stapled-on photos to scan. It's hard to believe this would not be cheaper, in 2018.
Visa applications too -- sometimes there's one kiosk-like machine which wants your fingerprints as well.
Mostly agreed. However, your last bit misses the point:
> the parameters for self taken photos are rather strict after all, such that it's quite hard to take photo that 'doesn't look like you' because of light, hair, makeup etc and have it be accepted.
The point there isn't to control for lighting conditions, but to make it physically impossible for the photo in the passport to be of someone who didn't bring the application in.
This is only partially true: because you cannot wear your glasses and you may need to put your hair in a specific way to clear your face, you definitely can obtain a picture that doesn't look like your casual look (even if the natural facial features are matching).
Biometric-compatible photos must be done at the site of issuance, because people just cannot stop smiling and doing other nonsense when taking photographs themselves.
A photo booth at the site of issuance is very cheap compared to salaries of employees who work there. And it lowers total cost of issuance when you consider costs on the side of the citizen.
Not true in the UK, most people apply for their biometric passport online (or by post, which costs more). Adults applying for their first passport may be asked to attend an interview.
The obvious low-tech solution to this problem is disallowing bringing your own photo, and having a photo booth at the passport application site, where you have to take the photo in front of the officer. Why do many countries still permit bringing your own photo?