Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This case buttresses the point that if it is not signed, it does not exist. I hope they bounce back strong.


Not that much. Term sheets aren't binding, so the fact that it wasn't signed is pretty much just decoration in this story.


All agreements are binding, term sheets as well if they are formulated as agreements. But what you agree upon in a termsheet is formulated as "if we do a deal, these are the terms". According to the story, in this case there was also a substantial break-up fee written into the agreement. It might be the case that the signature is all that is missing to make it enforcable.

However, there is without a doubt more to the story than revealed in the article. The missing signature might as well be a red herring, but not because "term sheets aren't binding".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: