Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This post is about Google pushing RCS to other platforms. I’m pointing out why their competitor, Apple, has not done the same with RCS’s competitor, iMessage. It’s an apples-to-apples comparison, and I consider it relevant to be mindful of this particular difference when considering RCS.

Google could have implemented crypto-signed device identifier attestation as a mandatory requirement for RCS, which would have given them considerable leverage against iMessage. Why wouldn’t they? What was more important to them than stopping texting spam?



> This post is about Google pushing RCS to other platforms.

RCS doesn't belong to Google. It's a standard.


> which would have given them considerable leverage against iMessage.

Citation needed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: