Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'd love to see an alternate timeline where one of these giant companies took their trillions of dollars and said "You know what, fuck you, shareholders! We're going to be pure research now!

If this alternate timeline where giant companies are autonomous creatures were to be, why would there be shareholders?



why would they even be companies?

Not sure if true but i read a funny: bezos entire fortune could keep the pentagon afloat for 2 whole weeks.


Forbes is saying he's got $211 billion so more like 3 months if we're comparing to the whole dod budget


That's shares number of shares times current share price, not money. If he starts selling those shares they won't all sell at that price.


$6.1 trillion 2023 seems 500b per month?


> why would they even be companies?

Because that's what was asserted to be in this alternate timeline. An alternate-alternate timeline could have no companies, sure, but the discussion is centred around a specific alternate timeline.


Maybe the companies could be run by LLMs. They will still need shareholders because, well, as far as I know at least computers can’t own property yet.


An alternate-alternate timeline might have companies run by LLMs, but the alternate timeline under discussion states that the giant companies act on their own accord, with their own dollars – which, again, questions where the shareholders fit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: