Ah, I must have missed that part, thanks. Though changing hosts is equivalent-enough to upgrading software that I think the point still stands. They probably changed hosts to save money - either go back, or fix what the changes broke, it's part of the standard expectations of changing things.
edit: actually... no, that still doesn't work. They clearly have 100% control over the interpreter since they can patch the source and use the patched version.
edit: actually... no, that still doesn't work. They clearly have 100% control over the interpreter since they can patch the source and use the patched version.