The "glare handling" pictures makes me wonder why anybody would buy a portable device (=to sometimes be used outdoors) and be happy with those outrageous reflections. I mean, you can barely see the content!
Glossy displays are exclusively better in controlled lighting, because their black levels are actually good. Controlled lighting is not difficult to achieve and is already a necessity for graphics work.
Actually, it can even be better outside. A screen with reflections on it is not as bad as a screen that you can't see due to low contrast.
(I'm currently using a matte desktop LCD, but wasted tons of time looking for a model with an 8-bit screen and good contrast.)
Whatever happened to the matte-ish finish used on some late-90s-and-on CRTs? I had some with way less glare than my MBP, and, being a CRT, about as perfect black levels as you're going to get.
Personally I find the glare from matte displays far more annoying than that from glossy. It diffuses across the whole display and makes contrast much worse
It's interesting how people's personal preferences affect these things. I hate the gloss on my MacBookPro because it makes it very hard to watch any movie without being distracted by reflections on the screen.
I accept that it's an excellent screen, and if I was in a better environment (or doing professional work) I'd be grateful for the good screen.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6023/the-nextgen-macbook-pro-w...
With the new decice, Aplle again tries to makes those unusable mirrors the only display you can order. I'll pass.