Yes, and AI is demonstrably less biased than Slate is. Your point? Are you arguing for bias?
The article was worded extremely slantingly. It was at least clear to me. In emotional contexts, it's best to stick to the least biased stories you can find.
It would be less concerning if it was not clear to you. Sharing that it was clear to you is evidence of the very deficiency in judgement that everyone is highlighting.
You are woefully ill-equipped to be making such assessments, yet you continue to do it with confidence despite everyone telling you why you're wrong.
You literally asked AI to write your argument for you: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43530149
Maybe cool it on the source policing.