Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I suppose he doesn't really have to prove anything to anyone. Not everyone wants to run a 10,000 or 50,000 employee company. Not everyone would be happy with the stress or bureaucracy involved.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but your attitude is exactly the kind of thing he's talking about in the linked interview. Mega growth and mega profits are one measure of success. A life with low stress and plenty of time for your family (and by the way, making all that possible for your employees, too) is another one.



I agree with what you. His style of running a business as likely maximized his personal happiness, and possibly his employees.

But I would have liked to see him say "we could have been far more profitable, but we didn't care about that, so we limited hours and didn't hire salespeople." Instead what I hear him saying is "we are the best business we could be, because we limit hours."


>> His style of running a business as likely maximized his personal happiness, and possibly his employees.

Rather than the main focus being happiness, I think the main focus is:

Are you building something great?

And he believes maximizing happiness and job satisfaction is a core component of achieving something great.


You have it reversed. Building something great is a component of happiness.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: