Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Except there are clear health hazards likely to happen from this change, such as increased tire particulates, and the nominal improvement (co2) is such a diffuse hazard (with limited direct health consequences) that it is likely to get lost in the noise.


Every change to a complex situation will have negative outcomes.

A study was done, and they have clear data to make this decision.

As time moves forward, new studies can be done addressing your concerns, and decisions can be made about addressing those.

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good.


lol, clearly you have no experience with California and these types of decisions.


lol, better just give up and accept no improvement then.


The point is, it is no actual improvement.

But then, you likely are fully aware of that eh?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: