> US isn't governed by anything at this point, except some rich people

> Sometimes, it's better just to say nothing :)

Right.

Who currently governs the US who isn't rich? Or do you disagree with that it's a bad idea that only rich people govern? I understand you want me to say nothing, that much is clear, but I don't understand what specific part you disagree with though.

How about that mayor of Seattle? Although she's doing a pretty bad job.

"Sometimes, it's better just to say nothing"

You should make this as your life credo. Change "sometimes" into "always" till you learn something.

It's called Continental law system, because main principles are same. And above that, there's EU legislation which is mandatory to all member states and is always to be adopted in national laws.

And your bullshit about law working for the rich in US is really stupid. Extremly rich are almost untouchable everywhere in the World. Rich have a fighting chance of getting better outcome. And poor people have chance tk seek justice against roughly equal opponent. This is not about US, this is about how World works.

> You should make this as your life credo. Change "sometimes" into "always" till you learn something.

Somewhat of a paradox no? I'm guessing your belief here is that I learned something by what you just told me, so me not saying until now when I read your comment, is exactly what you wanted?

> It's called Continental law system, because main principles are same. And above that, there's EU legislation which is mandatory to all member states and is always to be adopted in national laws.

If you're under the belief that all countries in Europe have the same laws across borders because many countries have a civil law system, I'm not sure what to tell you, that's not how it works, and many countries have very different law systems, even if they come from the same origin. Neither would I say that countries "adopt EU legislation", but I guess that's a technicality. Usually you'd say that the countries implement their own laws based on the directives the European Commission comes up. But again, borderline nitpick, maybe better I don't mention this at all lest y'all get stuck on this particular point...

> This is not about US, this is about how World works.

Yeah, let me know when you understand how the entire world works friend ;) I won't claim to know that, although I do know home. But again, have fun, surely you'll get close! :)

Huh, that's different, a comment filled with just supposed insults? For what? :P Why are you so angry about it all? Why does nothing in your comment have anything to do with the topic at large? So many questions, and I hope, such an interesting reply to come.

>Why does nothing in your comment have anything to do with the topic at large?

My previous comments are related to the topic. Yours are just desperate attempt to portray yourself as someone knowledgeable, which you're not.

Keep living your online fiction, slumdog millionaire.

> Europe isn't one country with one law system across the continent...

The Napoleonic Code is indeed pervasive across the continent. And, ignoring that, we have EU law, which is supra-statal law that most certainly and de facto has come to replace/impose on "local" laws.

https://lawshun.com/article/what-is-the-relationship-between... explains the complex relation between EU law and national law.

in a nutshell, EU law takes precedence over conflicting national laws in areas where the EU has competence.

While EU law is directly applicable or requires transposition into national law, member states retain autonomy in areas outside EU competence.

National courts are obligated to interpret domestic law in line with EU law.

National Constitutional Court/Supreme court, occasionally challenge EU law’s supremacy.

They can also just ignore it because the EU has no army, only economic retaliation is possible. Hungary did this for years.