Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

ITIL is at version 5 now - the idea of a process, is not exactly forgotten in the industry.

But you're working with a stochastic system. Even GPU matrix calculations are nondeterministic. It isn't possible, to the delete the entire source code and get exactly the same software back.

And any spec, that is specific and non-ambiguous enough to carefully construct the exact needs of each is... Well, that's code. Not a PBI, not an Epic. It's code.



I said "functionally", not (as Claude says) "byte-identically".


I said Epic and PBI, not bytes. User Stories are ambiguous. Acceptance Criteria can be argued. And which path in our languages ambiguities that the model will follow, cannot be deterministic by the nature of our hardware.

If you produce a spec that is entirely unambiguous in every way, again, that's code. That's the purpose of a programming language - distilling from the natural ambiguities of natural language, to specificity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: