It is a key point... if splits are encouraged and made easier (and I agree it'd be healthier for the market if the largest companies did), then liability needs to be handled carefully.

One doesn't want to create a 'snake sheds its skin' scenario where Meta (for example), stuffs all its liability in a spin-off, yet keeps the profits those actions accrued in the other entity.

Can we stop with taxing everything you don’t like? Taxes should be equal and used to fund the government, not as tools to make people do things you like.

I question the assumption that taxes you don't like will not fund the government

"Should" needs some unpacking; there's a subjective value lurking inside.

Personally, i prefer economic incentives over coercion. My starting point: there is a degree to which society must govern entities within it.

What type of taxes, state or federal? Because federal taxes do NOT fund federal spending.

https://mmt101.substack.com/p/an-explanation-of-why-taxes-do...

Taxes used to offset the costs of undesirable activity are the most effective and efficient taxes, but you want less of that?

Can we stop with pushing all of the taxes into the work-consume economy and out of the invest-return economy? The latter is eating the world, would it really hurt it to help clean up its own messes for once?