I don't see anything that makes me think it's homophobic?
Me neither. But then again, I don't see anything that makes me think it's sexist. Or racist, for that matter.
And yes. Parenting sites that assume that fathers can't be parents are sexist.
Well, that's the problem I'm trying to highlight. They probably assume no such thing. But we must brand them as sexist by the same token that we are not supposed to tolerate a guy with a beard on an IT recruitment site.
Here's another example: when Nike uses a photograph of a tall black guy to advertise their basketball shoes - are they being racist, sexist and disrespectful to short people?
> Well, that's the problem I'm trying to highlight. They probably assume no such thing.
That's true. It's a good thing someone points it out, then.
> Here's another example: when Nike uses a photograph of a tall black guy to advertise their basketball shoes - are they being racist, sexist and disrespectful to short people?
Me neither. But then again, I don't see anything that makes me think it's sexist. Or racist, for that matter.
And yes. Parenting sites that assume that fathers can't be parents are sexist.
Well, that's the problem I'm trying to highlight. They probably assume no such thing. But we must brand them as sexist by the same token that we are not supposed to tolerate a guy with a beard on an IT recruitment site.
Here's another example: when Nike uses a photograph of a tall black guy to advertise their basketball shoes - are they being racist, sexist and disrespectful to short people?