The best we can hope for is people attempting to take their personal bias out of reporting and investigate the full story, especially when what happened contradicts their worldview. Real journalists do this. News Corporation (Fox News/WSJ/etc) specifically does the opposite.
I don't think that and never claimed it. In fact, I've done the opposite if you look through this thread. But saying 'others post blatantly biased articles, too' doesn't excuse the fact that the Wall Street Journal is very obviously doing it here.
When you say real journalists take their personal biases out of their reporting and then immediately say that Fox News does the opposite, that certainly comes across as suggesting that Fox News doesn't do real journalism and that its competitors do.
And I certainly didn't say "others post blatantly biased articles" so I don't know why you used quotes when you summarized (and distorted) my comment.
Honestly, I think the term 'bias' is thrown around a bit too much and has a pejorative sense that shuts down discussion of the underlying ideas. Subjective vs. objective is probably a better way of characterizing news reports although I would argue that when you are talking about broad public policy it is pretty difficult to be 100% objective since everyone is affected by broad public policy.
