Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Correct. Their lesson was that you shouldn't claw back equity from underperforming executives, you should just let them go.


How do you know they were underperforming? Maybe the board just realized they could get a lot of extra money by looking for an excuse to get rid of them?


Your speculative conspiracy theory is plausible, but I work with one of the people who made this decision.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: