> Given he tried to have several people killed I imagine he finds himself on the wrong side of multiple executive orders, laws and moral frameworks alike...
Sure, not saying he is a moral person, or not a criminal, or that he is likely to be even in the smallest measure a good person. But he clearly is not a hostile foreign power in and of himself, though I am sure he would love to be considered one ;)
My only argument regarding DPR is that this sort of EO might end up applying to targets other than agents of hostile governments or terrorists or whatever the current boogieman is.
> As for your second paragraph I would imagine you'd have to prove some form of intent in order to throw someone in jail?
I would hope so, and that things like "intent to sell/export tools to find and exploit security vulnerabilities" would not be enough, even when interpreted by non-expert police, prosecutors, juries and judges.
Sure, not saying he is a moral person, or not a criminal, or that he is likely to be even in the smallest measure a good person. But he clearly is not a hostile foreign power in and of himself, though I am sure he would love to be considered one ;)
My only argument regarding DPR is that this sort of EO might end up applying to targets other than agents of hostile governments or terrorists or whatever the current boogieman is.
> As for your second paragraph I would imagine you'd have to prove some form of intent in order to throw someone in jail?
I would hope so, and that things like "intent to sell/export tools to find and exploit security vulnerabilities" would not be enough, even when interpreted by non-expert police, prosecutors, juries and judges.