>You have fallen for the false assumption that evolution is teleological
it isn't false, it is true - the evolution leads to exponentially more complex systems. There is a very simple mathematical reason for that - evolution changes are small continuous deltas and a delta-changes to a more complex system cover more volume in the parameter space. Very rough - an organism with 2 times more types of cells, limbs, other morphological and behavioral features, etc.. will produce 2 times more of survivable variations.
>humans are the farthest along that teleological path.
mammals are farthest down the complexity path and humans just a bit further as it seems that we have a bit more complex brain.
Your Harward link is wrong on at least 2 metrics of biological systems both of which shows clear [exponential] increase as result of evolution - complexity and entropy increase integrated over given biological system's life-path in the space-time (that ability to maximize entropy beyond what can be achieved by following local gradient is the main differentiator between live and regular matter)
From some quick googling (if I had time I'd come up with better):
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolphil/teleology.html
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2013/04/not-as-evolved...
http://spacetimechronicles.blogspot.com/2009/03/are-we-pinna...