Sorry I wasn't clear in my comment, but at the end I state the same thing. The Schneier article is still true, but the linked microsoft research article needs an update.
>That all said the sentiment of the article still stands true. Users (like my family) hate worrying about security.
When I said "article" I was talking about the full document which gets directly into security best practice.
Also HN Comment guidlines indicate you shouldn't ask Did you read the article?
> Please don't insinuate that someone hasn't read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I was also having an off day yesterday specifically around HN, but seeing your comment made my day. Thanks :-) I hope you have a much better day today as well.
>That all said the sentiment of the article still stands true. Users (like my family) hate worrying about security.
When I said "article" I was talking about the full document which gets directly into security best practice.
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cormac/papers/...
Also HN Comment guidlines indicate you shouldn't ask Did you read the article?
> Please don't insinuate that someone hasn't read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html